Updates to the EPB rating system (as shown in CDB and SURF) This aligns the enlisted rating to have similarities with that of the officers Now that the brief does not document levels of performance for enlisted members In the EPB era, if you see "VC" you know the report is NOT a referral and the member met standards The only other option is an "EC" which indicates a referral
EPR Codes Explanation : r AirForce - Reddit Spells EVAL C stands for revision C Revision B is 1-5 5B for example if a "firewall 5" Difference between B and C is in B, the rating is also the promote In C, the promote statement is separate ("Promote Now", "Must Promote", "Promote")
vMPF shows my 2015 EPR with LC as a rating. Anyone know what . . . - Reddit From my Chief: Here are text codes for new EPRs, as reflected on the SURFs and CDBs: First Character (AF Form 910 911): L - Exceeded most if not all expectations A - Exceeded some but not all expectations V- Met all expectations E - Met some but not all expectations N - Not rated
Understanding the 1-10 Rating scale? : r movies - Reddit I think about the scale as a line segment scale So there are movies with the same rating for example 8 but in my mind I may view them as 8 0 and 8 9 With the ones very close to a better or worse rating I am always thinking if I should bump them up to the next rating or take them down a notch to a lower rating
Chess. com Game Review Rating Estimate : r chess - Reddit The rating estimate in the picture seems the most egregious (Black played the opening in a way that suggests they've never really studied the QGA, which definitely isn't 1850) PGN for reference: 1 d4 d5 2 c4 dxc4 3 e3 b5 4 a4 Ba6 5 axb5 Bxb5 6 Nc3 c6 7 b3 cxb3 8 Nxb5 cxb5 9 Bxb5+ Nd7 10 Qxb3 e6 11 Nf3 Nf6 12 O-O Bd6 13 Ra6 Bc7 14