- RVS in SCIPY Python - Stack Overflow
The full signature for beta rvs is: rvs(a, b, loc=0, scale=1, size=1, random_state=None) When I first wrote that this method produces a single value of a pseudorandom variable, I should have indicated that this would be by default, since size=1 That is, the method produces a sample of size one by default
- python - Scipy: lognormal fitting - Stack Overflow
There have been quite a few posts on handling the lognorm distribution (docs) with Scipy but i still don't get the hang of it The lognormal is usually described by the 2 parameters \\mu and \\sigma
- python - scipy. stats seed? - Stack Overflow
The advantage of this method over assigning it to the random_state of rv_continuous or rv_discrete is, that you always have explicit control over the random state of your rvs, whereas with my_dist random_state = np random RandomState(seed=342423) the seed is lost after each call to rvs, possibly resulting in non-reproducible results when losing
- python - Understanding scipy. stats. norm. rvs()? - Stack Overflow
rvs(loc=0, scale=1, size=1, random_state=None) If you look at the code (line 2771) you have: loc : array_like, optional Location parameter (default=0) size : int or tuple of ints, optional Defining number of random variates (Default is 1) Note that size has to be given as keyword, not as positional argument
- What are the arguments for scipy. stats. uniform? - Stack Overflow
uniform rvs(loc=5, scale=45) Even though it's possible to call the distribution directly with parameters,
- c++ - How to create a static library with g++? - Stack Overflow
You can create a a file using the ar utility, like so: ar crf lib libHeader a header o lib is a directory that contains all your libraries it is good practice to organise your code this way and separate the code and the object files
- Where is scipy. stats. dirichlet_multinomial. rvs? - Stack Overflow
Unfortunately it seems that scipy stats dirichlet_multinomial does not define the rvs method that other distributions use to generate random samples I think this would be equivalent to the following for a single sample:
- python - Difference between random draws from scipy. stats. . . . rvs and . . .
I saw what joon mentioned where, in particular, random numbers from the normal distribution were much more quickly generated with numpy than from rvs in scipy stats As user333700 mentioned there is some overhead with rvs but if you are generating an array of random values then that gap closes compared to numpy Here is a jupyter timing example:
|