|
- How do the post increment (i++) and pre increment (++i) operators work . . .
Working: increment a to 6 (current value 6) + increment a to 7 (current value 7) Sum is 13 now add it to current value of a (=7) and then increment a to 8 Sum is 20 and value of a after the assignment completes is 8 i = a++ + ++a + ++a; is i = 5 + 7 + 8 Working: At the start value of a is 5 Use it in the addition and then increment it to 6
- How to increment a pointer address and pointers value?
*ptr++, the value is not incremented, the pointer is These unary operators have the same precedence but they are evaluated right-to-left The code means "take the contents from where ptr points at, then increment ptr" It is very common C code (and yes, quite confusing) Please correct this and I'll remove the downvote
- What is the difference between increment operator(++) and addition . . .
Increment x; Return the temporary variable; Whereas pre-increment (++x) will do something like this: Increment x; Return x; So using pre-increment requires less operations than post-increment, but in modern day systems this usually makes no worthwile difference to be a decent way of optimising code
- syntax - Python integer incrementing with ++ - Stack Overflow
The main reason ++ comes in handy in C-like languages is for keeping track of indices In Python, you deal with data in an abstract way and seldom increment through indices and such The closest-in-spirit thing to ++ is the next method of iterators
- How to create id with AUTO_INCREMENT on Oracle?
or specify starting and increment values, also preventing any insert into the identity column (GENERATED ALWAYS) (again, Oracle 12c+ only) create table t1 ( c1 NUMBER GENERATED ALWAYS as IDENTITY(START with 1 INCREMENT by 1), c2 VARCHAR2(10) ); Alternatively, Oracle 12 also allows to use a sequence as a default value:
- c - What is the difference between ++i and i++? - Stack Overflow
Pre-increment is always at least as efficient as post-increment: in fact post-increment usually involves keeping a copy of the previous value around and might add a little extra code As others have suggested, due to compiler optimisations many times they are equally efficient, probably a for loop lies within these cases
- When to use an auto-incremented primary key and when not to?
Auto-increment should be used as a unique key when no unique key already exists about the items you are modelling So for Elements you could use the Atomic Number or Books the ISBN number But if people are posting messages on a message board then these need a unique ID, but don't contain one naturally so we assign the next number from a list
- Most efficient way to increment a Map value in Java
Remember the new AtomicLong passed to putIfAbsent and the return value of the method, followed by using the right one for the increment Of course, since Java 8 it’s even simpler to use map computeIfAbsent("foo", key -> new AtomicLong(0)) incrementAndGet(); …
|
|
|